Europe's War on Free Speech

September 17, 2009

COPENHAGEN, Denmark -- Freedom of speech around the world has been a hallmark of Christian civilization, but today there is less and less freedom to criticize Islam.
In Denmark, a 15-year-old Danish boy faces prison time for distributing leaflets warning that the country could someday become a Muslim nation and that he thinks that is a bad thing. A Danish prosecutor called the leaflets "hate speech."

Yet, across the water in Sweden, it was not hate speech when a leading national newspaper printed an article a few weeks ago claiming that Israeli soldiers harvest and sell organs from dead Palestinians. Some say that claim amounts to the anti-Semitic Jewish blood libel, that Jews commit human sacrifice on non-Jews.

The Swedish government, which defended the newspaper, said it was free speech.
Welcome to Europe, where many say the difference between free speech and hate speech is dictated by left-wing political correctness and fear of Islam.
"Free speech is coming under increasing pressure by the day," Lars Hedegaard, head of the International Free Press Society, told CBN News.
It does not matter if the criticism is factual.

For instance, Islam teaches that when Mohammed was 52, he consummated his marriage to a 9-year-old girl. But when Austrian politician Susanne Winter said that, in today's world, Mohammed would be considered a child molester, she was convicted of hate speech.
Dutch Parliament member Geert Wilders is awaiting trial on the charge of "inciting hatred and discrimination." In Wilders' short film about Islamic violence "Fitna," he simply reprinted violent verses from the Koran itself and added video of radical sermons and photos of Islamic terrorism.

"He's being accused of hate speech for repeating in a film what radical imams and religious leaders have been saying about their own motives and their beliefs," Hedegaard said. "They're not being prosecuted for hate speech. He's being prosecuted for repeating it."
But there is another force behind the push to censor critics of Islam -- the 56-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference. Only the United Nations is larger.
"In 2008, the Organization of the Islamic Conference laid out a 10-year plan for suppression of free speech and for the introduction of laws that would prevent criticisms of religions and the reading of Islam," Hedegaard explained.

The OIC calls itself the collective voice of the world-wide Muslim "ummah," or nation. It has its own declaration of human rights, called the Cairo Declaration.
The document states "All rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah," which is strict Islamic law.
Marshall Sana, an Islamic expert at Barnabas Fund, said the OIC "actually wields an enormous amount of influence."

"That's been evident the last few years with perhaps its number one agenda item, which is combating 'Islamophobia' as they call it, or the defamation of religion," he added.
The OIC calls Islamophobia "the worst form of terrorism" and a threat to world peace.
"That has been a project under construction by the OIC, to develop the concept of 'Islamophobia' as any criticism upon Mohammed, the Koran, the fundamentals of Islam, but now it's being coupled with racism," Sana said.

The Organization of the Islamic conference is now a major force in the United Nations. For four straight years, the U.N. has adopted a non-binding OIC resolution banning the defamation of religion.
Observers say the ultimate goal of the OIC is to get a U.N. law criminalizing criticism or blasphemy of religion, even though Wilders said that in the Muslim world, respect for religion only goes in one direction.

 
"Look at how Christians today are treated in countries where Islam is dominant," he said. "Try buying a Bible in Saudi Arabia. Try to visit a church in Iran. Try to do anything Christian in an Islamic country. There is no room for it. They are intolerant."

Supporters of Wilders said free speech itself is on trial, and if Wilders loses, it will be the ultimate religious, political, and cultural capitulation by the Dutch government to Islam.
The Wilders case is just a small part of a growing worldwide phenomenon-- the censorship of any speech that criticizes Islam.
"You'd better care because this is a road circus that's coming your way," Hedegaard warned Americans.
Wilders agreed, saying, "Don't think this won't happen to you. Don't think it won't happen to the United States."
CBN News Original Broadcast Date: September 11, 2009.

The Muslim Wolf At Feminism's Door - Honor Killings

By Sultan Knish
9-25-9 Link:

More than 5000 women are victims of honor killings each year. Most of those women are Muslim, and while most of them are killed in Muslim countries-- more and more of them are being killed in Europe, Canada and America. A 2007 study by Dr. Amin Muhammad and Dr. Sujay Patel in Canada's Memorial Hospital observed that honor killing spreads when those whose who practice it emigrate to Western countries.

Honor killings however are only the final act in the drama of a Muslim woman's life. Before that she is expected to walk behind a man, to be a second class citizen, to cover herself as much as possible in order to deflect male desire and to take the blame for the sexual intentions that men have toward her. She knows that if she fails to deflect male desire, she may suffer a variety of penalties from imprisonment to death. In countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran, those penalties are imposed by courts. In countries like Afghanistan or Pakistan, they are imposed by rough tribal justice. In the West, where there is no Islamic court system or tribal courts, they are imposed by the family.

The burka, the chador, the hijab or any of the other covering garments are assigned to Muslim women to "protect" them from men, and to protect men from them. These garments are meant to cover their "Awrah", which in Arabic means nakedness, fault or defect. While for a Muslim man "Awrah" is only the swimsuit region, a Muslim woman is entirely "Awrah".

Al-Qadhi Ibn-Al-Arabi Maliki states: "And all of a woman is 'awrah; her body, her voice, and it is not permissible for her to uncover that unless out of necessity, or need such as witnessing in court, or a disease that is affecting her body..." [Ahkam Al Quran 3/1579]

Imam Al-Qurtubi stated went even further stating; "It is forbidden for a woman to speak when non-related men are present and it is forbidden for men to hear the voice of a non-mahram woman as long as there is no need for that."

What that means is that all of a woman is "a zone of shame" and obscene. Even the sound of her voice is a form of "nakedness" or "lewdness". Various Muslim authorities claim that this applies to even a woman's fingernails and eyes. A woman who fails to dress this way is behaving obscenely and is open to being assaulted, as the Koranic verse which orders Muslim women to cover themselves makes clear.

"O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested." -Al-Ahzab:59 (Qur'an)

The key word here of course is "that they shall be known as such and not molested". Conversely the failure to fully cover up (a covering that Mohammed demonstrated by cloaking himself and leaving only one eye uncovered in order to see) leaves them open to being molested under the code of "she was asking for it."

In the wake of the brutal Sydney gang rapes in which the perpetrators told the victims and exchanged messages among themselves making it clear that the attacks were motivated by the girls being Australian and Christian, Australia's top Muslim cleric, the infamous Sheikh Hilaly delivered a sermon stating;

"When it comes to rape, it's 90 percent the woman's responsibility. Why? Because a woman owns the weapon of seduction. It's she who takes off her clothes, shortens them, flirts, puts on make-up and powder and takes to the streets, God protect us, dallying. It's she who shortens, raises and lowers. Then, it's a look, a smile, a conversation, a greeting, a talk, a date, a meeting, a crime, then Long Bay jail. Then you get a judge, who has no mercy, and he gives you 65 years."

"But when it comes to this disaster, who started it? In his literature, writer al-Rafee says, if I came across a rape crime, I would discipline the man and order that the woman be jailed for life. Why would you do this, Rafee? He said because if she had not left the meat uncovered, the cat wouldn't have snatched it."

The "uncovered meat" were girls as young as 14, whom the attackers brutalized for hours. Their crime was that they were meat, and they had left themselves uncovered by failing to wear Chadours or Hijabs to prevent themselves from being "molested".

This is the Muslim wolf that now stands growling outside the feminist door. The wolf dictates that women in any country with a sizable Muslim population have two choices, to cover up or be assaulted. By covering up the woman accepts her inferiority to the male. Refusing to do that could get her raped or killed. There is no third option within Islam. In Iraq, in Kashmir, in Pakistan; women have had acid thrown in their faces for not wearing the appropriate Muslim garb.

But why speak of countries under medieval Islamic laws, when you can speak of the "Free West". A French survey found that 77 percent of the women who wear Hijabs did so because of threats by Islamist groups. 77 percent. France. We are not speaking about some backward little Third World nation where the tribal elders decide what goes. We are speaking of Paris, the glittering city of lights, the capital of art and music. The birthplace of Republican Europe.

This is what Hijab feminism looks like in France...

More often the girls were under orders from their fathers and uncles and brothers, and even their male classmates. For the boys, transforming a bluejeaned teen-age sister into a docile and observant "Muslim" virgin was a rite de passage into authority, the fast track to becoming a man, and more important, a Muslim man.... it was also a license for violence.

Girls who did not conform were excoriated, or chased, or beaten by fanatical young men meting out "Islamic justice." Sometimes the girls were gang-raped. In 2002, an unveiled Muslim girl in the cite of Vitry-sur-Seine was burned alive by a boy she turned down.

Jane Kramer, Taking the Veil, New Yorker

Despite that 77 percent number, American feminists insist on fighting for "the right" of Muslim women in France and America to wear the veil. They might as well be fighting for the right of women to be barefoot and pregnant, since they are one and the same.

Much as they might eagerly parrot the propaganda of the Muslim Student Association, itself an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, regarding the veil being liberating, the veil is a statement of female submission and degradation. There is nothing feminist about being inferior. The hijab is part of a larger agenda to force Muslims in the West, and even non-Muslims to live under Islamic law. A law which states that women are inferior to men.

In the process apologists for Islam like Karen Armstrong or Noah Feldman misrepresent key Arabic words, for example defining "Awrah" as beauty, or "Zina" as meaning only adultery, or seizing on whatever property Sharia law allowed women to hold as feminist, while completely ignoring the larger issue that women were considered inferior by Mohammed and his men, and are considered inferior under Islamic law today. Not simply in theory, but in fact. A fact that expresses itself in the rapes, beatings and murders of women, both Muslim and non-Muslim, by Muslim men on a regular basis.

Rather than confront the threat to women posed by Islamic law, feminist authors like Naomi Wolf are instead claiming that the wolf is really a misunderstood poodle. They have tried to transform the Hijab into a statement of Muslim feminism, while completing ignoring the fact that the Hijab only exists because Islamic law views all of a woman as obscene and treats the woman's presence in the public sphere as a source of Fitna and Zina, Discord and Immorality, that incites men to do immoral things, including rape her. Under Islam the woman is a threat to men that can only be rendered safe for men by fully covering her up and keeping her apart from men as much as possible.

What does Naomi Wolf think is an urgent issue? Based on her blog, it isn't women, but Muslim men. Specifically defending the sort of Muslim men who kill women who don't wear the veil. Wolf's blog is filled with posts fulminating against Guantanamo Bay and the plight of the Taliban and assorted other Islamists imprisoned there. The same men who if given a chance would have a knife to her neck in minutes.

This spring in Pakistan's Sindh province alone, 40 honor killings took place. One woman took refuge in a police station, only to be handed over to her brother who killed her. A 14 year old girl was burned to death. Two women had acid poured on them after being raped. Two women had their noses chopped off for violating family honor. The Sindh province had been overrun by the Taliban.

Rather than writing about any of these women, Naomi Wolf instead wrote demanding to know "What Happened to Mohamed al-Hanashi?" Her article describes Mohamed al-Hanashi as "a young man" who could shed light on many crimes. Not the crimes of Islamist terrorists, but the crimes of the US in detaining in Islamist terrorists. At no point in time throughout the article does Naomi Wolf mention that Mohamed al-Hanashi was a member of the Taliban. The same Taliban which mandated complete covering for women, forbade women to be treated by male doctors or to get an education.

In April 2009, Sitara Achakzai, a leading women's rights activist in Afghanistan, was murdered by the Taliban because she supported rights for women. 3 days later, Naomi Wolf did not write about her. Instead she wrote an article claiming that the American people had "blood on their hands" over Gitmo and demanded that we hold Nuremberg Trials to determine who gave the order to "torture" captured Al Queda and Taliban terrorists in order to gain information about future attacks against America.

Unfortunately, Naomi Wolf, like most modern liberal feminists had no interest in defending those women, only in defending their abusers. While women were being murdered by the Taliban, she sweated blood and tears to defend members of the Taliban. Finally in August, Naomi Wolf went to a Muslim country, put on a headscarf and described how it made her feel free. That seems like a reasonable preparation for the sort of environment that Naomi Wolf and much of the feminist movement are helping to create for women in the West.

In 1984 the Party's slogan is "Slavery is Freedom." The political use of such an idea is that it is easier to enslave people, if they believe that being enslaved makes them free. It is why every one party Communist dictatorship made sure to call themselves a "Democratic People's Republic". It is why the Muslim Brotherhood fronts understand that it will be easier to sell Westerners on subjugation to Islam, if they believe that this subjugation makes them free.

For almost a decade, Wolf and those like her, have been assailing the brave men and women who helped liberate women from the Taliban... while fighting for the Taliban. In the name of freedom of course. The freedom of those who shot up girls' schools, who threw teachers down staircases and beat women in the streets. Now the Muslim wolf has its snout thrust into half of Europe, into Australia, Canada and America. The honor killings continue to rise.

Bodies continue to show up in hospitals and morgues. The bodies of the victims of Islam.

In brief: Health District suspends mercury limits for H1N1 shots

The Spokesman Review September 25, 2009

Washington health officials have temporarily suspended limits on the amount of mercury allowed in the upcoming H1N1 influenza vaccine for pregnant women and children younger than 3 years old.

The move comes after Health Secretary Mary Selecky was informed that the initial batches of vaccines against the swine flu may not include enough doses that were specially packaged without thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative.

The preservative is controversial among some people who believe that it may be linked to autism and other childhood disorders. But widely accepted and peer reviewed medical studies have shown there is no harm caused by thimerosal.

Selecky said the suspension is designed to ensure that pregnant women and children have access to the vaccines, even though they may contain thimerosal.

The swine flu vaccines will be available in early October, while the seasonal flu vaccines are available now.

John Stucke

Pediatric Deaths in Flu-Infested Schools in CO and SC

Recombinomics Commentary 12:29
September 24, 2009

Bryan Pineda, 13, was found unconscious at his home Wednesday and later died at Breckenridge Medical Center.
On Friday he tested positive for Type A flu, and “currently 99 percent of positive Type A flu tests are thought to be 2009 H1N1 (swine) influenza,” according to a joint statement from Summit County Public Health and Coroner Joanne Richardson.
Summit High School principal Drew Adkins said 105 students missed school Tuesday due to illness, with 46 reporting flu symptoms. That's nearly 13 percent of the student body.
Laurence Manning Academy announced Tuesday that the school will close its doors until Monday.
The headmaster of the school told News19 that there are no confirmed cases of Swine Flu. It's estimated that 200 kids missed class Monday, and 280 were out of class Tuesday.
About 1,000 students attend the private school.
Ashley Pipkin was a fifth-grade student at Laurence Manning Academy in Manning. Family members said Pipkin began to feel bad Monday with flu-like symptoms. She took a codeine-based cough medicine and began having trouble breathing Tuesday.
Ashley's family said she was a healthy, active child who played softball.
The above comments describe two pediatric deaths announced yesterday.  One (14M) was a high school student in Colorado who attended a school (see map) with more than 13% of students absent, while the other (11F) attended a school that was closed because over 25% of students were absent (see map).  The level of H1N1 circulating in those schools was likely considerably higher than the absentee rates, because students without fever were likely still attending school.  Fever is in the H1N1 case definition, and most students with swine flu without fever are not tested or sent home from school.
Neither news story suggests the students had underlying conditions and the parents of the elementary student maintain that she was “healthy” and “active” in softball.  These cases are similar to other pediatric cases who played football or soccer days before they died.  These cases were also in areas over-run with swine flu, raising concerns that these schools that remain open when absenteeism exceeds 10% are creating an environment that leads to unnecessary deaths in previously healthy children.
The swine flu levels are misrepresented by local officials with statements of no confirmed swine flu in the area.  The lack of confirmation is linked to a lack of testing.  Most state health departments do not test samples from previously healthy cases without underlying conditions or not hospitalized.  Private physicians also rarely test for H1N1  because it is not flu season, so almost all cases that are influenza A positive are infected with swine flu and expensive confirmatory tests are not ordered.
Similarly, the percentage of students with H1N1 are under-represented because those without fever are not even tested for influenza A.  Moreover, symptoms such as nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting are not considered to be flu-like.  Thus, even though more than 11% of the students were absent in the Colorado school district, 5% were said to have flu-like conditions, while the 6% with sore throat and/or gastrointestinal problems, were not classified as “flu-like” even though sore throat and gastrointestinal problems are swine flu symptoms.
Moreover, those who are influenza A positive are frequently described as seasonal or “normal” flu cases, even though state agencies report no seasonal flu cases and the latest weekly CDC report indicates that 97% of samples positive for flu are subsequently confirmed as swine flu.  Similarly, those with a sore throat are said to have strep throat, those with a running nose and headache are said to have allergies or a cold, those with a cough are said to have bronchitis, and those with gastrointestinal problems or vomiting are said to have a “stomach bug”.
Consequently, schools with H1N1 levels as high as 25% are said to have no confirmed H1N1 and/or flu-like conditions in less than 5% of the student population.

These misrepresentations lead to additional spread within the school district and unnecessary deaths in previously healthy children and adolescents.

Prof. Guarino: Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Lisbon Treaty

September 24, 2009 LaRouche — Prof. Giuseppe Guarino was a featured speaker at a meeting organized by a think-tank called Astrid in Rome on Sept. 21, and made a powerful intervention against the Lisbon Treaty, polarizing the audience. He was interviewed by Euronews. The seminar was entitled "The Finding of the German Constitutional Court and Its Effects on the Construction of the European Union."

In his speech, which he sent to EIR, but is not yet meant for publication, Prof. Guarino attacked those experts of constitutional law who have given up their duty of questioning the direction of new constitutional laws. "You cannot limit yourself to interpret and apply [constitutional law]. You must look beneath the surface, go back to the underlying causes and try to understand where institutions are pushing us." The current EU structure is the wrong answer to a financial development that started in the 1960s, when national monetary creation was replaced by international private centers. We did that by giving up monetary sovereignty, which was "replaced with a technical management entrusted to an organ with a non-political character, the European Central Bank." Under the Stability Pact, Europe declined because debt creation for investments was blocked. The EU has no policy in the current crisis, except suggestions to cut the budget or increase taxes. "In both cases, no liquidity is added to the economy," and "ultimately, families are hit who generate liquidity.... [I]f you curtail family budget, you get social reactions whose damage would be greater than the benefit you want to achieve."

And yet, the possibility to generate a recovery is there. "We refer to the results one could achieve, by aggregating large volumes of capital ... to pursue extraordinary innovative targets (nuclear energy, space exploration, computer development) or grandiose infrastructural works (river deviations, great hydroelectric power plants, irrigation and cultivation of entire regions, etc.). The large projects of transformation and innovation have precious and large spin-offs on scientific and cultural development and in general on the life of the community."

All this could be financed through debt created by the state. This is not possible in the EU. "To politically manage a currency is an extreme form of political activity. It involves decisions which political authorities would not themselves produce without participation of central banks," and "which no central banker, even when empowered with assessing employment and development needs, can produce without consent of the highest political authorities.... The essence of the economic policy of a country is exactly this." Such decisions "In a democratic regime, involve necessarily the existence of central organs which originate directly or indirectly from an electoral body which is unitary expression of the European people taken in its unity." This means to completely change the form of the European Union, and make it become a federal state. If nothing changes, Europe is doomed to decline.

"If Lisbon is implemented, abandon any hope."

The system of power of the European Union is not democratic. This will be worse with the Lisbon Treaty. "The largest quotient of power in the Union is concentrated in the Commission, whose powers are larger than any other organ. They include nerve centers. However, the Commission lacks democracy. "It accumulates legislative and executive power, in an open violation of the principle of the division of powers."

Guarino calls for a debate among all law experts in order to change the treaty. "We have the duty of going outside of the protected enclosure of interpreting the law. Using our knowledge, we have the mission and the obligation to warn about what will happen. Nobody owns absolute truth, we might make mistakes in elaborating and forecasting, But in the end, a debate will bring clarity on the goals to achieve."

U.S. Households Still Getting Much Poorer

September 24, 2009 (LPAC)—Economists in Washington have projected that the average American household's real income is in the process of falling by a huge 9.3% (-$4,813/year) from 2007-2010, taking households back to early- to mid-1990s level income. The Economic Policy Institute (EPI) projects that the average household has already had its income cut by 8.1% (-$4,212/year) from July 2007 to now. This is the largest income drop since the Great Depression, and has occurred simultaneously with a loss of wealth by households, of $6 trillion, or $50,000 per household in the United States.

The Institute's projection comes from Census Bureau reports already released, which cover only the milder period of this economic collapse, mid-2007 to mid-2008. As far as poverty of households is concerned, the EPI projects that the national poverty rate will increase to 15.1% by early 2010, even against the extremely low income measure of the official "poverty line"; that child poverty is increasing by 8.6% to 26.6% of all American children in poverty in early 2010; and that the poverty rate among Black Americans is increasing by 7.3% to 31.8%!

The heads of these households are not finding work, despite constant claims of an "economic turn-around" by the Obama White House. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported today that long-term unemployment (joblessness for more than 27 weeks while actively seeking work) in August reached 3.2% of the entire U.S. civilian workforce, the highest level in BLS-data history, and well above the 1981 recession peak of 2.6% of labor force.

Of course this is only that fraction of long-term unemployed officially recorded as such and receiving state or fed benefits (5.1 million workers). The real number includes 6 million others who've given up and dropped out of the labor force, and others who don't receive benefits; it is near 8% of the whole workforce, who've wanted a job and been unable to find one for more than six months.

In August, the number of job seekers per available job reached 6.2 [!] and rising—again, a record—from 1.7 two years ago.

Joseph Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist): “Swine flu vaccine is bioweapon”

Friday, August 21, 2009 www.Unfictional.com

Joseph Moshe, MOSSAD

Today, the MSM are not talking about this case any more. Yesterday, they wanted us to believe that Joseph Moshe was a nutcase and a terrorist, arrested for threatening to bomb the White House. Interesting detail about his arrest (the “Westwood standoff”) was that he seemed to be immune to the 5 cans of tear gas and 5 gallons of law-enforcement grade  pepper spray they pumped into his face. He very calmly remained in his car, as the video footage of his arrest shows.

Professor Moshe  had  called into a live radio show by Dr. A. True Ott, broadcast on Republic Broadcasting claiming to be a microbiologist who wanted to supply evidence to a States Attorney regarding tainted H1N1 Swine flu vaccines being produced by Baxter BioPharma Solutions. He said that Baxter’s Ukrainian lab was in fact producing a bioweapon disguised as a vaccine. He claimed that the vaccine contained an adjuvant (additive) designed to weaken the immune system, and replicated RNA from the virus responsible for the 1918 pandemic Spanish flu, causing global sickness and mass death.

Sources tell us that Bar-Joseph Moshe made no threat against the President or the White House. He did not mention any bomb or attack. He then proceeded to inform the White House he intended to go public with this information. When he noticed men in suits in front of his house and feared that the FBI was about to detain him, he packed some belongings into his car and, him being a dual Israeli citizen, tried to reach the Israeli consulate located in close proximity to the federal building where the standoff took place. The FBI and the bomb squad prevented him from reaching it. Who is this man? His profile on biomedexperts.com says he is a plant disease expert with many publications on his name involving the genetic manipulation of virii. Photographic evidence that Moshe is who he says he is can be found here.

Joseph Moshe was soon after his arrest sent or let go to Israel. Nothing has been heard from him since. The Secret Service was not the agency involved in the surveillance of Moshe at his home in California. This was done by the FBI, who had orders to detain or arrest him. Mounted on top of a large black vehicle used in his arrest was a microwave weapon that possibly damaged the electronics in Moshe’s car as well as any communication devices he had which might have been used to contact the media or others who could help him.

Moshe did not suffer the same effects of the gas and pepper spray that others would have because he had built up an immunity to such weapons as a by-product of his Mossad training. Moshe was not handcuffed because he was not placed under arrest.

Does this sound like an insane conspiracy theory? Sure it does. Due to the scarcity and anonimity of the sources we would dismiss it as exactly that, if it weren’t for some uncomfortable facts: Baxter Pharmaceutical has been caught, red-handed, in spreading a live, genetically engineered H5N1 Bird flu vaccine as a lethal biological weapon all over the world, destined to be used for human vaccinations. This happened just a few months ago. And only luck prevented a global catastrophe of epic proportions.

Baxter International Inc. had mixed live, genetically engineered avian flue viruses in vaccine material shipped to 18 countries. Only by sheer luck, a Czech laboratory decided to test the vaccine on a dozen ferrets, which all died in days. The World Health Organization was notified and catastrophe was averted. This was clearly a deliberate act on Baxter’s part, because they adhere to BS3, bio-safety level three. Baxter admitted a “mistake”. Such monumental screw- ups are totally impossible at that level. Many safety systems would have needed to be sabotaged, many key personnel would have needed to be bribed. It simply can’t be done without direction from the inside. They did not send out the wrong vial – they produced dozens of gallons of biological-weapon agent (genetically engineered live H5N1 / Bird flu virus), then sent it out as a “vaccine”.

Baxter knew full well that their vaccine was lethal, because the year before they had tested it on a few hundred homeless Polish people – dozens died as a result.

Where’s the meat? Well – Baxter is now being sued for the deliberate, repeated contamination of vaccines with biological weapons designed – by them – to mass-murder people. Here is the complaint (PDF). By some kook nutcase? Not likely – Jane Burgermeister is an experienced, respected journalist. She is not the only one suing Baxter for planning and executing a plan for global genocide: Other are filing complaints as well. Read a well-researched complaint here (PDF).

Motive? The latter complaint alludes to it. Have you heard of the Georgia Guidestones? An enormous monument loaded with Masonic symbolism costing millions of dollars, it has been erected by unknown, powerful elites (multimillionaires with the clout to erect monuments wherever they please, obviously) around 30 years ago. It gives an “alternative ten commandments”, of which the first is the extermination of six and a half billion people from the face of the Earth. Half a billion will remain. This is the number of people the planet can sustain indefinitely, so that the descendents of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers can live in peace and affluence indefinitely. Slaves are needed to produce that luxury, but 500 million will do just fine. But how does one go about killing off most of the world?

“Vaccinating” the planet with a bio weapon with near-100% mortality would do the trick. Baxter would provide both the bio weapon as well as the vaccine against it to “civilized” Western peoples. Result: We can plunder Africa, we have no more competition from SE Asia, the oil is for our taking and only Western and perhaps Chinese sheeple remain.

Rockefeller said this in 1994 at a U.N. dinner: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.” PNAC said something similar right before 9/11.

Risks of Nasal Vaccines

Neuroscience: exploring the brain By Mark F. Bear, Barry W. Connors, Michael A. Paradiso explains the following in regards to the organs of smell:

“Sniffing brings air into the convoluted nasal passages but only a small percentage of that air passes over the olfactory epithelium. The epithelium exudes a thin coating of mucus, which flows constantly and is replaced about every ten minutes. Chemical stimuli in the air, called odorants, dissolve in the mucus layer before they reach receptor cells. Mucus consists of a water base with dissolved mucuspolysaccharides (long chains of sugars); a variety of proteins, including antibodies, enzymes, and odorant binding proteins; and salts. The antibodies are critical because olfactory cells can be a direct route by which some viruses (such as the rabies virus) and bacteria enter the brain. Also important are odorant binding proteins which are small and soluble and may help concentrate odorants in the mucus.” Link:

Now, a vaccine like Flumist and Tami flu with live viruses would pose a reasonable risk of entering the brain as well as any other bacteria or virus, especially considering the amount of (weakened) virus administered in a single dose.  Of course we don’t see this happening very often but the risk is there and this is one of many reasons I personally would not use this kind of vaccine, and I would not under any circumstances give it to my children.

The only one who will watch out for your own health is you. Make educated decisions.

Admin

Related to this post:

Nasal version of H1N1 vaccine and Tamiflu side effects in Canadian aboriginals

International Bankruptcy For Banks Discussed at Zürich Conference; LaRouche Responds

September 20, 2009 (LPAC)— A proposal for a bankruptcy reorganization of multinational banks, is covered on the Saturday front page of the financial daily Neue Zürcher Zeitung. Under the headline "Bank Regulation Has Its Traps/Global Bankruptcy Procedure Discussed," the article reports on a high-level conference organized by the Europa Institut of the Zürich University on Sept. 18, where an international bankruptcy solution was put forward by a Swiss regulator, Eva Hüpkes. Mrs. Hüpkes is member of the Swiss Federal Banking Commission and is one of the three members on the organizing board of the conference. Mrs. Hüpkes is also a member of the Financial Stability Board, which includes central bankers, regulators and government representatives of member countries.

"A global bank insolvency procedure for large banks would greatly reduce systemic risks. But such an insolvency procedure is not feasible in the short term. This was made clear in a seminar at Zürich University," says the article. The bankruptcy procedure is not politically feasible, Mrs. Hüpkes says, because "governments" are against.

In reporting Hüpkes' intervention, the NZZ writes: "The worst problem first: Worldwide many banks are considered too significant to die — therefore they enjoy de facto a state guarantee. The 'solution' is in principle at hand: a global agreement on the orderly liquidation of large international banks, in order to avoid having each new failure threaten a systemic crisis. This could make guarantees for big banks superfluous. But such a global agreement remains unrealistic in the short term, because of a lack of will by national governments.

"According to the latest FSB report, in insolvency cases, national solutions will be applied, like it or not. According to Hüpkes, it should be made easier to disentangle large banks, than the case today: From a national standpoint, it should be possible to somehow separate 'systemically relevant' parts — by this, the payment system as well as the domestic savings and credits system are meant — from the rest of the crisis-struck institution. Several opinions, however, yesterday showed that the concretization of this 'somehow' faces legal, political, and economic obstacles. One model would be that banks hit by a crisis should first sell systemically relevant parts — either to the private sector or to the state.

"However, until such models become reality, the main burden for the bureaucratic regulation of banks lies in liquidity and capital provisions.... Representatives of banking and research sectors, however, warned against excessive expectations from capital provisions (if the crisis is large enough, even a thicker capital cover would not be sufficient) and against the danger of new wrong incentives (if the capital quota is too high, the banks could be pushed into taking more risks)."

The conference also dismissed the bonuses issue as "secondary" and as a "sidebar issue."

A major editorial in the NZZ, published on the same page as the remainder of the article, discusses whether international banks have learned from the crisis and have gone back to a business-oriented model. The conclusion is: No, if you look at Goldman Sachs. GS is making profits today using the same schemes as in the past. Things are different in Switzerland, where the two large banks, partly by their own decision, partly forced by regulators, have gone back to a business model more oriented to activities generated by its clientele.

LAROUCHE RESPONDS:

Lyndon LaRouche responded to this report as follows.

There is no competent purpose in such proposals, unless an equivalent of the Glass-Steagall standard is the premise for such action.

1. Presently ongoing general breakdown-crisis of all among the world monetarist systems has been ongoing, with qualitatively worsening, cancerous-like effects, since September 2007. The "bail-outs," in the order no less than tens of trillions of dollars in the U.S. alone, have presently eliminated any possible reform within the framework of the existing international monetarist system.

2. The only effective remedy depends upon replacing the existing monetary systems, as systems, entirely. We must proceed by using a U.S. model of a Glass-Steagall standard, putting banks under in-bankruptcy protection by national governments, and supplying long-term, state-backed credit under a credit system, rather than a monetary system, while destroying the dubious forms of monetarist speculation. (e.g., reversing the Euro "reform.")

3. The operative intent must be to establish a global, fixed-exchange-rate system among what may be classed as viable nation-states' banking, while eradicating all remnants of a floating-exchange-rate monetarist system, for its replacement by a global fixed-exchange-rate credit system, rather than a Keynesian or comparable form of monetarist system. Such a reform, if backed by a consortium of participating major powers as the principal sponsors, would restart the world economy and responsible forms of national and international banking under a fixed-exchange-rate credit system shared among responsible nations, as supplemented by good-sense adaptation to the economies of other nations.

4. The feasibility of such an undertaking depends upon a general agreement to replace a monetary system with a credit system of participating national credit-systems, while closing down monetarist systems.

5. A related problem is located in the lunacy of globalization. The monetization associated with a globalized system, has destroyed the ability of nations to buffer their national economic security behind the protection of national sovereignties as a protective border against international avalanches of panic. This change to a kind of New Tower of Babel, has introduced new, previously non-existent source of danger for the world economy under the crisis-conditions of today. Since such creatures as former PM Tony Blair, while in abundance, are not edible, protectionist remedies among perfectly sovereign nation-states is the only actual source of remedies.

6. One can not base an economic reform on orderly reconciliations among venereal diseases or drug lords. The monetarist system of today is a venereal disease, and a drug on the world. First cancel it in bankruptcy reform, and create a new, Glass-Steagall-modelled, protectionist form of international credit system. Then, quickly set the wheels of credit back in motion under the auspices of the new credit system which replaces the unsalvageable monetarist system.

— Lyndon.

Obama Urged to Ready Tougher Iran Sanctions, Military Strike

By Janine Zacharia

Sept. 15 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. should begin preparing crippling sanctions on Iran and publicly make clear that a military strike is possible should the Iranian government press ahead with its nuclear effort, a bipartisan policy group said.

“If biting sanctions do not persuade the Islamic Republic to demonstrate sincerity in negotiations and give up its enrichment activities, the White House will have to begin serious consideration of the option of a U.S.-led military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities,” said the study from the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington.

The report was written by Charles Robb, a former Democratic senator from Virginia; Daniel Coats, a former Republican senator from Indiana who also served as ambassador to Germany, and retired General Charles Wald, the former deputy commander of U.S. European command. Their assessment comes as the U.S. prepares to participate in preliminary talks with Iran on Oct. 1 designed to gauge its commitment to address concerns about its nuclear aims.

The report echoes the Obama administration’s conclusion that Iran’s atomic work is approaching a destabilizing point at which it may be able to build a bomb.

Coats, Robb and Wald write that Iran will have enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon by next year, “leaving little time for the United States to prevent both a nuclear- weapons capable Islamic Republic and an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities.”

Gasoline Sanction

The authors back a bill that would sanction foreign companies that export gasoline to Iran, if negotiations fail. They say the administration should have prepared “sufficient financial, political and military pressure” before agreeing to negotiations.

The U.S. will dispatch its undersecretary of state for political affairs, William Burns, to the Oct. 1 meeting with U.S. allies and Iran without conditions. Iran has said its nuclear program is closed for discussion. The State Department said yesterday it will use the meeting to outline the consequences of Iran proceeding with a nuclear program.

The U.S. and its allies on the United Nations Security Council plus Germany have pushed Iran to accept a suspension of sanctions in exchange for Iran’s halt to uranium enrichment.

Iran has expanded its nuclear stockpile to 1,430 kilograms of low-enriched uranium hexafluoride compared to 75 kilograms in December 2007, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. It has also almost doubled its number of centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility at Natanz since 2007.

Deadline Proposed

The authors say a deadline of 60 days should be set for determining Iran’s seriousness once it commits to negotiations. If those negotiations fail, the administration should toughen sanctions and “prepare overtly for any military option.”

Such preparations could include deploying an additional aircraft carrier battle group to the waters off Iran and conducting joint exercises with U.S. allies.

In the absence of U.S. action, Israel is more likely to strike, the authors argue, saying that an Israeli strike “entails more risks than a U.S. strike.”

Israeli officials say that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose a threat to their country’s existence.

To contact the reporter on this story: Janine Zacharia in Washington atjzacharia@bloomberg.net.

Nasal version of H1N1 vaccine and Tamiflu side effects in Canadian aboriginals

Admin. September 21, 2009

Russel Means Freedom got an article posted September 19 2009 by Kevin D. Annett that says:

“Last week, many of the aboriginal people in the remote west coast village of Ahousaht were inoculated with the Tamiflu vaccine. Today, over a hundred of them are sick, and the sickness is spreading.

In the same week, body bags were sent to similarly remote native reserves in northern Manitoba that have also received the Tamiflu vaccine.

On the face of things, it appears that flu vaccinations are causing a sickness that is being deliberately aimed at aboriginal people across Canada, and this sickness will be fatal: a fact acknowledged by the Canadian government by their “routine” sending of body bags to these Indian villages.” Link to whole article:

Drugs.com states the following Tamiflu side effects:

All medicines may cause side effects, but many people have no, or minor, side effects.Check with your doctor if any of these most COMMON side effects persist or become bothersome when using Tamiflu:

Diarrhea; nausea; stomach pain; vomiting.

Seek medical attention right away if any of these SEVERE side effects occur when using Tamiflu:

Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue); abnormal behavior; confusion; hallucinations; mood or mental changes; reddened, blistered, peeling, or swollen skin; seizures; severe or persistent nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea; symptoms of infection (eg, fever, chills, persistent sore throat).

At the same time we hear that there is a nasal version of H1N1 vaccine available now:

“WASHINGTON: The first US roll-out of vaccines against the new swine flu virus will be 3.4 million doses of MedImmune's nose spray, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said on Friday.
The CDC's Dr Jay Butler said the vaccines would be distributed the first week of October. "Initially we anticipate that 3.4 million doses of vaccine will be available," Butler told a telephone briefing. "We anticipate being able to start receiving orders for the vaccine by early October," Butler added.
The US government is providing the H1N1 vaccine for free to about 90,000 distributors, including doctor's offices, retail chains and state health departments. "We estimate that the amount of vaccine that will be available will increase through October," Butler said, adding that eventually delivery would rise to about 20 million doses a week.” Link to article:

Lets remember that this new version of the vaccine have not been tested for safety.

Wikipedia.org mention a study on military personnel: “A military study on military personnel showed that flu shots yielded less illness than nasal spray. Based on one of the largest head-to-head studies comparing LAIV and TIV (which was conducted by the U.S. Armed Forces Surveillance Center on military personnel who were stationed in the United States during three flu seasons from 2004 through 2007), investigators concluded that: "It may be prudent to use TIV in patients who were vaccinated at least once in the past 2 years [...] but LAIV against pandemic strains maybe be more protective than inactivated vaccines, because the population will probably lack preexisting immunity."

Lets look at Flumist : For at least 21 days after receiving FluMist, avoid close contact with anyone who has a weak immune system caused by disease (such as cancer, HIV, or AIDS), or by certain medicines such as steroids, cancer chemotherapy, or radiation treatment. A person with a weak immune system can become ill if they have close contact with you after you have recently received a an influenza vaccine.

Am I the only one confused? This LAIV seem to have popped up out of nowhere. I will follow the development without blinking.

Admin.